[PATCH] drm/i915/display: Add power well mapping for WCL
Gustavo Sousa
gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Mon Jul 14 15:07:50 UTC 2025
Quoting Chaitanya Kumar Borah (2025-07-14 02:53:44-03:00)
>WCL has 3 pipes, create power well mapping to reflect
I believe display fuses should reflect that, right? I don't have a WCL
handy to check that, but I believe so.
In that case, I believe a better solution would be to filter out the
power well mapping during initialization (__set_power_wells) based on
the availability of the associated hardware resource (display pipes in
this case).
That way, we do not need to hardcode different mappings for different
variations of a display arch.
--
Gustavo Sousa
>HW. Rest remains similar to Xe3 power well configuration.
>
>Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah at intel.com>
>---
> .../i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
>index 77268802b55e..23c59b587f78 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_map.c
>@@ -1717,6 +1717,60 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc_list xe3lpd_power_wells[] = {
> I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xe2lpd_power_wells_pica),
> };
>
>+static const struct i915_power_well_desc wcl_power_wells_main[] = {
>+ {
>+ .instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
>+ I915_PW("PW_2", &xe3lpd_pwdoms_pw_2,
>+ .hsw.idx = ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2,
>+ .id = SKL_DISP_PW_2),
>+ ),
>+ .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
>+ .has_vga = true,
>+ .has_fuses = true,
>+ }, {
>+ .instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
>+ I915_PW("PW_A", &xelpd_pwdoms_pw_a,
>+ .hsw.idx = XELPD_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_A),
>+ ),
>+ .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
>+ .irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_A),
>+ .has_fuses = true,
>+ }, {
>+ .instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
>+ I915_PW("PW_B", &xe3lpd_pwdoms_pw_b,
>+ .hsw.idx = XELPD_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_B),
>+ ),
>+ .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
>+ .irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_B),
>+ .has_fuses = true,
>+ }, {
>+ .instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
>+ I915_PW("PW_C", &xe3lpd_pwdoms_pw_c,
>+ .hsw.idx = XELPD_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_C),
>+ ),
>+ .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
>+ .irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_C),
>+ .has_fuses = true,
>+ }, {
>+ .instances = &I915_PW_INSTANCES(
>+ I915_PW("AUX_A", &icl_pwdoms_aux_a, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_A),
>+ I915_PW("AUX_B", &icl_pwdoms_aux_b, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_B),
>+ I915_PW("AUX_TC1", &xelpdp_pwdoms_aux_tc1, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_USBC1),
>+ I915_PW("AUX_TC2", &xelpdp_pwdoms_aux_tc2, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_USBC2),
>+ I915_PW("AUX_TC3", &xelpdp_pwdoms_aux_tc3, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_USBC3),
>+ I915_PW("AUX_TC4", &xelpdp_pwdoms_aux_tc4, .xelpdp.aux_ch = AUX_CH_USBC4),
>+ ),
>+ .ops = &xelpdp_aux_power_well_ops,
>+ },
>+};
>+static const struct i915_power_well_desc_list wcl_power_wells[] = {
>+ I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(i9xx_power_wells_always_on),
>+ I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(icl_power_wells_pw_1),
>+ I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xe3lpd_power_wells_dcoff),
>+ I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(wcl_power_wells_main),
>+ I915_PW_DESCRIPTORS(xe2lpd_power_wells_pica),
>+};
>+
> static void init_power_well_domains(const struct i915_power_well_instance *inst,
> struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> {
>@@ -1824,7 +1878,9 @@ int intel_display_power_map_init(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains)
> return 0;
> }
>
>- if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30)
>+ if (DISPLAY_VERx100(display) == 3002)
>+ return set_power_wells(power_domains, wcl_power_wells);
>+ else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 30)
> return set_power_wells(power_domains, xe3lpd_power_wells);
> else if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 20)
> return set_power_wells(power_domains, xe2lpd_power_wells);
>--
>2.25.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list