Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for Updates for drm/xe/configfs (rev4)
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Wed Jul 23 17:15:00 UTC 2025
On 7/22/2025 10:57 PM, Patchwork wrote:
> *Patch Details*
> *Series:* Updates for drm/xe/configfs (rev4)
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/151773/ <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/151773/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:* https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-151773v4/index.html <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-151773v4/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-3455-90f3e20cc198cddd5ccaa6ca66382a60114b2245_FULL -> xe-pw-151773v4_FULL
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-151773v4_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-151773v4_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-151773v4_FULL:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> *
>
> igt at kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank:
>
> o shard-dg2-set2: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3455-90f3e20cc198cddd5ccaa6ca66382a60114b2245/shard-dg2-464/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html> -> FAIL <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-151773v4/shard-dg2-436/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank.html> +1 other test fail
unrelated
(kms_flip:5873) DEBUG: vblank ts/seq: last 193.513855/1468, current 193.679626/1478: elapsed=165769.0us expected=164889.4us +- 824.4us, error 0.5%
(kms_flip:5873) DEBUG: inconsistent vblank ts/seq: last 193.513855/1468, current 193.679626/1478: elapsed=165769.0us expected=164889.4us
(kms_flip:5873) INFO: Event flip: expected 311, counted 310, passrate = 87.10%, encoder type 2
(kms_flip:5873) INFO: Event vblank: expected 311, counted 310, passrate = 83.87%, encoder type 2
(kms_flip:5873) DEBUG: dropped frames, expected 311, counted 310, passrate = 83.87%, encoder type 2
(kms_flip:5873) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __run_test_on_crtc_set, file ../tests/kms_flip.c:1704:
(kms_flip:5873) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !retried
> *
>
> igt at xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-malloc-nomemset:
>
> o shard-bmg: PASS <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-3455-90f3e20cc198cddd5ccaa6ca66382a60114b2245/shard-bmg-6/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-malloc-nomemset.html> -> DMESG-FAIL <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-151773v4/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_exec_system_allocator@process-many-execqueues-malloc-nomemset.html> +1 other test dmesg-fail
unrelated
<7> [229.020255] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm:xe_svm_handle_pagefault [xe]] VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=826, errno=-EFAULT
<7> [229.021142] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm:xe_svm_handle_pagefault [xe]] VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=827, errno=-EFAULT
<6> [229.025114] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Range is already in VRAM
<7> [229.034146] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm:xe_svm_handle_pagefault [xe]] VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=825, errno=-EFAULT
<7> [229.050707] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm:xe_svm_handle_pagefault [xe]] VRAM allocation failed, falling back to retrying fault, asid=824, errno=-EFAULT
<4> [231.830439] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] GT1: Pending enable/disable failed to respond
<6> [231.830494] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] GT1: trying reset from disable_scheduling_deregister [xe]
<6> [231.830889] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] GT1: reset queued
<6> [231.837412] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] GT1: reset started
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list