[PATCH v4 02/11] drm/xe: Print module init abort code

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 09:51:12PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/28/2025 9:39 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 07:19:59PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> >> We should provide a hint to the user why the module refused to
> >> load. This will also allow us to drop individual error messages
> >> from init steps.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> >> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> >> index 593bc9e5851a..23be7c4cfde1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> >> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ static int __init xe_init(void)
> >>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(init_funcs); i++) {
> >>  		err = xe_call_init_func(&init_funcs[i]);
> >>  		if (err) {
> >> +			pr_info("%s: module_init aborted at %ps %pe\n",
> >> +				DRIVER_NAME, init_funcs[i].init, ERR_PTR(err));
> > 
> > pr_err ?!
> 
> that was also my first choice, but then noticed
> 
> 	.init = xe_check_nomodeset,
> 
> which is used to skip driver load on purpose, but not due
> to a real error, so I decided to switch back to pr_info
> 
> but if you insist ...

hmmm okay, let's go with info then

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>



> 
> > 
> >>  			while (i--)
> >>  				xe_call_exit_func(&init_funcs[i]);
> >>  			return err;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.47.1
> >>
>