[PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/topology: Use register array size instead magic number
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Fri Jun 6 15:44:16 UTC 2025
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:29:07PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Since we keep registers in the array we can simply count them and
> stop relying on magic number when checking if didn't make mistake.
>
> Also we can switch to use xe_gt_assert() since it could be just
> our programming mistake during platform bringup, no need to keep
> drm_WARN() in the production driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> index 62bfb6e1a166..048743913b36 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
> @@ -236,8 +236,8 @@ xe_gt_topology_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> * Register counts returned shouldn't exceed the number of registers
> * passed as parameters below.
> */
> - drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, num_geometry_regs > 3);
> - drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, num_compute_regs > 3);
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, num_geometry_regs <= ARRAY_SIZE(geometry_regs));
> + xe_gt_assert(gt, num_compute_regs <= ARRAY_SIZE(compute_regs));
>
> load_dss_mask(gt, gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask,
> num_geometry_regs, geometry_regs);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
Linux GPU Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list