[PATCH v3 2/4] drm/xe/guc: Ignore GuC CT errors when wedged

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Sat Jun 7 00:10:29 UTC 2025


On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 11:42:54AM -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
>On 6/3/2025 10:34 AM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
>>On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 16:44 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>>>Messaging to GuC may get canceled when device is wedged. Don't
>>>flag this as an error in xe_guc_pc code.
>>So if we're wedged already we are already in an error state right? I
>>can understand flagging additional errors maybe gives a false negative,
>>or rather would prompt us to look at the earlier errors to make sure
>>these aren't just cascading, but do we really need to check for this?
>
>Yes, to avoid flase CI errors. This was actually for a CI failure seen 
>in the previous patch.

order should be inverted then. Make this patch the #1 and the other the
#2.

Lucas De Marchi


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list