[RESEND 5/5] drm/i915/plane: rename intel_atomic_add_affected_planes() to intel_plane_add_affected()

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 13 15:02:21 UTC 2025


On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:37:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Rename to follow filename based naming.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c   | 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.h   | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index bd81ff9e3854..978c524546c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5479,7 +5479,7 @@ static int intel_modeset_pipe(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
> +	ret = intel_plane_add_affected(state, crtc);

This breaks the common naming pattern. At the very least I think
it needs to keep the "planes" at the end to make it clear what
it's adding.

But from the "does this sentence make any sense?" POV I'd
rather it be called intel_crtc_add_affected_planes().

>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -6195,7 +6195,7 @@ static int intel_joiner_add_affected_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
> +		ret = intel_plane_add_affected(state, crtc);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> index 2ac7a4e655f5..11aeb7435b05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.c
> @@ -1433,8 +1433,8 @@ static int intel_crtc_add_planes_to_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				     struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +int intel_plane_add_affected(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +			     struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.h
> index 5cb995b2940f..4ef012c08fa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane.h
> @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ void intel_plane_helper_add(struct intel_plane *plane);
>  bool intel_plane_needs_physical(struct intel_plane *plane);
>  void intel_plane_init_cursor_vblank_work(struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
>  					 struct intel_plane_state *new_plane_state);
> -int intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -				     struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +int intel_plane_add_affected(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +			     struct intel_crtc *crtc);
>  int intel_plane_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
>  
>  u32 intel_plane_ggtt_offset(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
> -- 
> 2.39.5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list