[PATCH 5/6] drm/ttm: disable ttm_bo_validate_deleted_evict for now
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Mon Jun 16 13:07:25 UTC 2025
That test case uses internal TTM behavior which is about to change. We
need a mock fence or similar to get it working instead.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
index 4553c4e0e0f1..6766e1753343 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
@@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_validate_allowed_only_evict(struct kunit *test)
ttm_mock_manager_fini(priv->ttm_dev, mem_multihop);
}
+#if 0
static void ttm_bo_validate_deleted_evict(struct kunit *test)
{
struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx_init = { }, ctx_val = { };
@@ -1026,6 +1027,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_validate_deleted_evict(struct kunit *test)
ttm_bo_fini(bo_big);
ttm_mock_manager_fini(priv->ttm_dev, mem_type);
}
+#endif
static void ttm_bo_validate_busy_domain_evict(struct kunit *test)
{
@@ -1205,7 +1207,7 @@ static struct kunit_case ttm_bo_validate_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_happy_evict),
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_all_pinned_evict),
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_allowed_only_evict),
- KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_deleted_evict),
+ /*KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_deleted_evict),*/
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_busy_domain_evict),
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_evict_gutting),
KUNIT_CASE(ttm_bo_validate_recrusive_evict),
--
2.34.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list