[PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/cdclk: abstract intel_cdclk_actual() and intel_cdclk_actual_voltage_level()
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Wed Jun 18 18:17:29 UTC 2025
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:12:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add intel_cdclk_actual() and intel_cdclk_actual_voltage_level() helpers
> to avoid looking at struct intel_cdclk_state internals outside of
> intel_cdclk.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 994be1d0e20c..2e8abf237bd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -3884,3 +3884,13 @@ void intel_cdclk_read_hw(struct intel_display *display)
> cdclk_state->actual = display->cdclk.hw;
> cdclk_state->logical = display->cdclk.hw;
> }
> +
> +int intel_cdclk_actual(const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> +{
> + return cdclk_state->actual.cdclk;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_cdclk_actual_voltage_level(const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> +{
> + return cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
> +}
These could've been grouped better after intel_cdclk_logical().
I wondered if it'd make sense to use
intel_cdclk_{logical,actual}_cdclk() instead of
intel_cdclk_{logical,actual}().
Or *_clock() instead of *_cdclk() in the above and other helpers.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index 0d5ee1826168..f38605c6ab72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -103,5 +103,7 @@ int intel_cdclk_bw_min_cdclk(const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state);
> bool intel_cdclk_pmdemand_needs_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> void intel_cdclk_force_min_cdclk(struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state, int force_min_cdclk);
> void intel_cdclk_read_hw(struct intel_display *display);
> +int intel_cdclk_actual(const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state);
> +int intel_cdclk_actual_voltage_level(const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_CDCLK_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
> index 16ef68ef4041..d806c15db7ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c
> @@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ int intel_pmdemand_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> return PTR_ERR(new_cdclk_state);
>
> new_pmdemand_state->params.voltage_index =
> - new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
> + intel_cdclk_actual_voltage_level(new_cdclk_state);
> new_pmdemand_state->params.cdclk_freq_mhz =
> - DIV_ROUND_UP(new_cdclk_state->actual.cdclk, 1000);
> + DIV_ROUND_UP(intel_cdclk_actual(new_cdclk_state), 1000);
>
> intel_pmdemand_update_max_ddiclk(display, state, new_pmdemand_state);
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list