[PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dsb: use generic read_poll_timeout() instead of wait_for()
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Fri Jun 27 11:36:29 UTC 2025
Prefer generic poll helpers over i915 custom helpers.
The functional change is losing the exponentially growing sleep of
wait_for(), which used to be 10, 20, 40, ..., 640, and 1280 us.
Use an arbitrary constant 100 us sleep instead. The timeout remains at 1
ms.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
index 53d8ae3a70e9..6b43bd466714 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
*
*/
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+
#include <drm/drm_print.h>
#include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
@@ -871,8 +873,14 @@ void intel_dsb_wait(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc->base.dev);
enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
-
- if (wait_for(!is_dsb_busy(display, pipe, dsb->id), 1)) {
+ bool is_busy;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = read_poll_timeout(is_dsb_busy, is_busy,
+ !is_busy,
+ 100, 1000, false,
+ display, pipe, dsb->id);
+ if (ret) {
u32 offset = intel_dsb_buffer_ggtt_offset(&dsb->dsb_buf);
intel_de_write_fw(display, DSB_CTRL(pipe, dsb->id),
--
2.39.5
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list