[PATCH] drm/i915/display: Optimize panel power-on wait time
Dibin Moolakadan Subrahmanian
dibin.moolakadan.subrahmanian at intel.com
Mon Jun 30 12:23:39 UTC 2025
The current wait_panel_on() uses intel_de_wait() with a long timeout
(5000ms), which is suboptimal on Xe platforms where the underlying
xe_mmio_wait32() employs an exponential backoff strategy. This leads
to unnecessary delays during resume or power-on when the panel becomes
ready earlier than the full timeout.
This patch splits the total wait time into two pases
- First wait for the typical panel-on time(180ms)
- If panel is not ready , continue polling in short 20ms intervals
until the maximum timeout (5000ms) is reached
Signed-off-by: Dibin Moolakadan Subrahmanian <dibin.moolakadan.subrahmanian at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
index bff81fb5c316..57a062c8038d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
@@ -598,8 +598,67 @@ void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
#define IDLE_CYCLE_MASK (PP_ON | PP_SEQUENCE_MASK | PP_CYCLE_DELAY_ACTIVE | PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_MASK)
#define IDLE_CYCLE_VALUE (0 | PP_SEQUENCE_NONE | 0 | PP_SEQUENCE_STATE_OFF_IDLE)
+#define PANEL_TYPICAL_ON_TIME_MS (180)
+#define PANEL_MAXIMUM_ON_TIME_MS (5000)
+
static void intel_pps_verify_state(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
+/*
+ * Panel power-on typically completes within ~200ms. Using a large timeout
+ * (5000ms) with intel_de_wait() results in unnecessary delays,
+ * especially under Xe, where xe_mmio_wait32() uses an exponential backoff.
+ *
+ * To optimize resume and power-on latency, we first wait for the typical
+ * completion window, then perform short polling loops thereafter.
+ * This reduces worst-case latency while still ensuring correctness.
+ */
+static void wait_panel_on_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
+ struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
+ i915_reg_t pp_stat_reg, pp_ctrl_reg;
+ u32 mask = IDLE_ON_MASK;
+ u32 value = IDLE_ON_VALUE;
+ int elapsed = PANEL_TYPICAL_ON_TIME_MS;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&display->pps.mutex);
+
+ intel_pps_verify_state(intel_dp);
+
+ pp_stat_reg = _pp_stat_reg(intel_dp);
+ pp_ctrl_reg = _pp_ctrl_reg(intel_dp);
+
+ drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
+ "[ENCODER:%d:%s] %s mask: 0x%08x value: 0x%08x PP_STATUS: 0x%08x PP_CONTROL: 0x%08x\n",
+ dig_port->base.base.base.id, dig_port->base.base.name,
+ pps_name(intel_dp),
+ mask, value,
+ intel_de_read(display, pp_stat_reg),
+ intel_de_read(display, pp_ctrl_reg));
+
+ /* Wait for typical panel on time first */
+ if (intel_de_wait(display, pp_stat_reg, mask, value, PANEL_TYPICAL_ON_TIME_MS) == 0)
+ goto panel_wait_complete;
+
+ /* Wait for maxtime in 20ms intervals */
+ while (elapsed < PANEL_MAXIMUM_ON_TIME_MS) {
+ if (intel_de_wait(display, pp_stat_reg, mask, value, 20) == 0)
+ goto panel_wait_complete;
+
+ elapsed += 20;
+ }
+
+ drm_err(display->drm,
+ "[ENCODER:%d:%s] %s panel status timeout: PP_STATUS: 0x%08x PP_CONTROL: 0x%08x\n",
+ dig_port->base.base.base.id, dig_port->base.base.name,
+ pps_name(intel_dp),
+ intel_de_read(display, pp_stat_reg),
+ intel_de_read(display, pp_ctrl_reg));
+
+panel_wait_complete:
+ drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Wait complete\n");
+}
+
static void wait_panel_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
u32 mask, u32 value)
{
@@ -642,7 +701,7 @@ static void wait_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
"[ENCODER:%d:%s] %s wait for panel power on\n",
dig_port->base.base.base.id, dig_port->base.base.name,
pps_name(intel_dp));
- wait_panel_status(intel_dp, IDLE_ON_MASK, IDLE_ON_VALUE);
+ wait_panel_on_status(intel_dp);
}
static void wait_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
--
2.43.0
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list