[PATCH] drm/xe: fix enable survivability mode

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Mar 6 06:05:53 UTC 2025


On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:04:06AM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:24:07AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>The current implementation skipped entering survivability mode even when
>>survivability enable returned success. Enter survivability mode
>>if enable returns success
>>
>>Fixes: d40f275d96e8 ("drm/xe: Move survivability entirely to xe_pci")
>>Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro at intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi

>>---
>>drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c | 5 ++---
>>1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>index 6b5fa067b39b..ee0665e54489 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>>@@ -857,9 +857,8 @@ static int xe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>	 * HW to be enabled. In that case enable it and return success.
>>	 */
>>	if (err) {
>>-		if (xe_survivability_mode_required(xe) &&
>>-		    xe_survivability_mode_enable(xe))
>>-			return 0;
>>+		if (xe_survivability_mode_required(xe))
>>+			return xe_survivability_mode_enable(xe);
>
>ugh... the mix of bool and int above threw me off. I remember fixing it
>but probably forgot to put it in the series.
>
>+Francois
>
>Can we inject 2 errors to easily test this in igt?
>
>1. xe_device_probe_early() to return error
>2. xe_survivability_mode_required to return true
>
>Thanks,
>Lucas De Marchi
>
>
>>
>>		return err;
>>	}
>>-- 
>>2.47.1
>>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list