[PATCH v1] drm/xe/pcode: stop logging mailbox status as error

[Aravind Iddamsetty]

On 06-03-2025 14:27, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:08:07AM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>> Hi Raag,
>>
>> On 04-03-2025 11:47, Raag Jadav wrote:
>>> Since we're expecting many platform specific mailbox commands that
>>> might not be widely supported, stop logging them as errors. With this
>>> we can avoid unnecessary platform checks and use the return value of
>>> mailbox without enraging CI.
>> are you saying there are cases where we send a command that is not supported
>> on a particular platform?
> Yes. First instance on [1], which will be expanded with more commands.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210100515.2205584-1-raag.jadav@intel.com/

But why should we expose the interface which is not supported on that HW.

Thanks,
Aravind.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c
>>> index 9333ce776a6e..280f69119ff1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode.c
>>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static int pcode_mailbox_status(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>>  
>>>  	err = xe_mmio_read32(&tile->mmio, PCODE_MAILBOX) & PCODE_ERROR_MASK;
>>>  	if (err) {
>>> -		drm_err(&tile_to_xe(tile)->drm, "PCODE Mailbox failed: %d %s", err,
>>> +		drm_dbg(&tile_to_xe(tile)->drm, "PCODE Mailbox failed: %d %s", err,
>>>  			err_decode[err].str ?: "Unknown");
>>>  		return err_decode[err].errno ?: -EPROTO;
>>>  	}