[PATCH 2/2] drm: ensure drm headers are self-contained and pass kernel-doc

Jani Nikula jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Mar 13 10:59:16 UTC 2025


On Sun, 09 Mar 2025, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:59 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org> wrote:
>> As far as I'm concerned, I find this extremely helpful for DRM. If only
>> to ensure that the huge amount of work that went into cleaning up our
>> headers doesn't get lost.
>>
>> Nobody here claims that it should be enabled globally, just that it
>> should be enabled for DRM. We already have plenty of exceptions like
>> that for compiler flags, checkpatch, contribution process, etc. so I'm
>> not sure why those would be ok, but additional checks limited to a
>> subsystem wouldn't.
>>
>> Maxime
>
> Because we learned this feature is broken.
> It was broken under include/linux/, so it will be broken under include/drm/ too.

I don't think that's a valid conclusion.


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list