[PATCH v8 2/6] drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault: Move pagefault struct to header
Cavitt, Jonathan
jonathan.cavitt at intel.com
Mon Mar 17 20:55:35 UTC 2025
-----Original Message-----
From: Wajdeczko, Michal <Michal.Wajdeczko at intel.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2025 7:45 AM
To: Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>; intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Gupta, saurabhg <saurabhg.gupta at intel.com>; Zuo, Alex <alex.zuo at intel.com>; joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com; Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost at intel.com>; Zhang, Jianxun <jianxun.zhang at intel.com>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com>; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; michal.mzorek at intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault: Move pagefault struct to header
>
> On 14.03.2025 23:06, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wajdeczko, Michal <Michal.Wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2025 10:02 AM
> > To: Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>; intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Gupta, saurabhg <saurabhg.gupta at intel.com>; Zuo, Alex <alex.zuo at intel.com>; joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com; Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost at intel.com>; Zhang, Jianxun <jianxun.zhang at intel.com>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin at intel.com>; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; michal.mzorek at intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault: Move pagefault struct to header
> >>
> >> On 13.03.2025 19:34, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> >>> Move the pagefault struct from xe_gt_pagefault.c to the
> >>> xe_gt_pagefault_types.h header file, along with the associated enum values.
> >>>
> >>> v2:
> >>> - Normalize names for common header (Matt Brost)
> >>>
> >>> v3:
> >>> - s/Migrate/Move (Michal W)
> >>> - s/xe_pagefault/xe_gt_pagefault (Michal W)
> >>> - Create new header file, xe_gt_pagefault_types.h (Michal W)
> >>> - Add kernel docs (Michal W)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <Michal.Wajdeczko at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.h
> >>> index 839c065a5e4c..69b700c4915a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault.h
> >>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> >>>
> >>> #include <linux/types.h>
> >>>
> >>> +#include "xe_gt_pagefault_types.h"
> >>
> >> it's not needed here, move it to .c
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> struct xe_gt;
> >>> struct xe_guc;
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..90b7085d4b8e
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault_types.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Copyright (c) 2022-2025 Intel Corporation
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifndef _XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPES_H_
> >>> +#define _XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPES_H_
> >>> +
> >>
> >> don't forget to
> >>
> >> #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > That explains why the kernel failed to compile on CI. It was compiling just
> > fine locally, so that's why I missed this.
> >
> >>
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * struct xe_gt_pagefault - Structure of pagefaults returned by the
> >>> + * pagefault handler
> >>> + */
> >>> +struct xe_gt_pagefault {
> >>> + /** @page_addr: faulted address of this pagefault */
> >>> + u64 page_addr;
> >>> + /** @asid: ASID of this pagefault */
> >>> + u32 asid;
> >>> + /** @pdata: PDATA of this pagefault */
> >>> + u16 pdata;
> >>> + /** @vfid: VFID of this pagefault */
> >>> + u8 vfid;
> >>
> >> btw, IIRC the VFID from the descriptor will be zero'ed
> >> does it make sense to keep it here?
> >
> > Is the argument that every time pf->vfid is accessed, it's guaranteed to be
>
> it's FIELD_GET(PFD_VFID, desc->dw2) guaranteed to be zero
>
> > zero? I can't counter that claim, but wouldn't it be safer to keep reporting
> > the VFID in case we ever hit a case where it's no longer zero?
>
> it can't be non-zero, look at GuC ABI spec that says:
>
> ".. with the VF number being zero’d out in the descriptor."
>
> >
> > Also, did we know it would always be zero when we were making the
> > pagefault struct originally? If so, why did we include the vfid originally?
>
> dunno, ask authors, it was pushed part of the initial commit
> dd08ebf6c352 that was *not* going through normal review cycle
>
> >
> >>
> >>> + /**
> >>> + * @access_type: access type of this pagefault, as a value
> >>> + * from xe_gt_pagefault_access_type
> >>> + */
> >>> + u8 access_type;
> >>> + /**
> >>> + * @fault_type: fault type of this pagefault, as a value
> >>> + * from xe_gt_pagefault_fault_type
> >>> + */
> >>> + u8 fault_type;
> >>> + /** @fault_level: fault level of this pagefault */
> >>> + u8 fault_level;
> >>> + /** @engine_class: engine class this pagefault was reported on */
> >>> + u8 engine_class;
> >>> + /** @engine_instance: engine instance this pagefault was reported on */
> >>> + u8 engine_instance;
> >>> + /** @fault_unsuccessful: flag for if the pagefault recovered or not */
> >>> + u8 fault_unsuccessful;
> >>> + /** @prefetch: unused */
> >>> + bool prefetch;
> >>> + /** @trva_fault: is set if this is a TRTT fault */
> >>> + bool trva_fault;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * enum xe_gt_pagefault_access_type - Access type reported to the xe_gt_pagefault
> >>> + * struct. Saved to xe_gt_pagefault at access_type
> >>
> >> this seems to be copied from G2H descriptor as-is.
> >> so shouldn't this be part of the GuC ABI?
> >> or based on HW ABI if GuC is just a proxy
> >
> > What information should I be including in the kernel docs for these enums?
>
> are you asking about xe enums or GuC ABI defs/enums?
>
> for the xe enums, we can say this is what HW/GuC provides
> for the HW defs, we can likely drop kernel-doc
> we can just point to the Bspec in the commit msg
Could you please provide the bspec number for the pagefault
access and fault types? I tried searching for them on my end but
wasn't able to find them.
-Jonathan Cavitt
>
> > -Jonathan Cavitt
> >
> >>
> >>> + */
> >>> +enum xe_gt_pagefault_access_type {
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_READ = 0,
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_WRITE = 1,
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_ATOMIC = 2,
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_RESERVED = 3,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * enum xe_gt_pagefault_fault_type - Fault type reported to the xe_gt_pagefault
> >>> + * struct. Saved to xe_gt_pagefault at fault_type
> >>
> >> ditto
> >>
> >>> + */
> >>> +enum xe_gt_pagefault_fault_type {
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPE_NOT_PRESENT = 0,
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPE_WRITE_ACCESS_VIOLATION = 1,
> >>> + XE_GT_PAGEFAULT_TYPE_ATOMIC_ACCESS_VIOLATION = 2,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +#endif
> >>
> >>
>
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list