[PATCH v12 5/5] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl
Raag Jadav
raag.jadav at intel.com
Tue Mar 25 07:39:58 UTC 2025
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 11:09:28PM +0000, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Add support for userspace to request a list of observed faults
> from a specified VM.
...
> v10:
> - Remove unnecessary switch case logic (Raag)
This is usually "changes present in version" and not "comments received
in version" but I guess this must be one of those drm things.
...
> +static int xe_vm_get_property_helper(struct xe_vm *vm,
> + struct drm_xe_vm_get_property *args)
> +{
> + int size;
> +
> + switch (args->property) {
> + case DRM_XE_VM_GET_PROPERTY_FAULTS:
> + spin_lock(&vm->faults.lock);
> + size = size_mul(sizeof(struct xe_vm_fault), vm->faults.len);
> + spin_unlock(&vm->faults.lock);
> +
> + if (args->size)
> + /*
> + * Number of faults may increase between calls to
> + * xe_vm_get_property_ioctl, so just report the
> + * number of faults the user requests if it's less
> + * than or equal to the number of faults in the VM
> + * fault array.
> + */
> + return args->size <= size ? fill_faults(vm, args) : -EINVAL;
You're comparing an int with u32 and I'm not sure how this plays out.
The usual practice is to use size_t (even in the struct) but I'm not aware
of its userspace counterpart.
Raag
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list