[RFC 06/29] drm/xe/vm: Update xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops to take an increment value
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Fri Mar 28 02:56:21 UTC 2025
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:32:03PM +0530, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Prefetch for SVM ranges can have more than one operation to increment,
> hence modify the function to accept an increment value as input.
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 60303998bd61..53a80c0af8de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -806,13 +806,13 @@ static void xe_vma_ops_fini(struct xe_vma_ops *vops)
> kfree(vops->pt_update_ops[i].ops);
> }
>
> -static void xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, u8 tile_mask)
> +static void xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, u8 tile_mask, u8 inc_val)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < XE_MAX_TILES_PER_DEVICE; ++i)
> if (BIT(i) & tile_mask)
> - ++vops->pt_update_ops[i].num_ops;
> + vops->pt_update_ops[i].num_ops += inc_val;
> }
>
> static void xe_vm_populate_rebind(struct xe_vma_op *op, struct xe_vma *vma,
> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static int xe_vm_ops_add_rebind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops, struct xe_vma *vma,
>
> xe_vm_populate_rebind(op, vma, tile_mask);
> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask, 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ xe_vm_ops_add_range_rebind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>
> xe_vm_populate_range_rebind(op, vma, range, tile_mask);
> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, tile_mask, 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ xe_vm_ops_add_range_unbind(struct xe_vma_ops *vops,
>
> xe_vm_populate_range_unbind(op, range);
> list_add_tail(&op->link, &vops->list);
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, range->tile_present);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, range->tile_present, 1);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -2475,7 +2475,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> if ((op->map.immediate || !xe_vm_in_fault_mode(vm)) &&
> !op->map.is_cpu_addr_mirror)
> xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops,
> - op->tile_mask);
> + op->tile_mask, 1);
> break;
> }
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_REMAP:
> @@ -2536,7 +2536,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> (ULL)op->remap.start,
> (ULL)op->remap.range);
> } else {
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2565,11 +2565,11 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> (ULL)op->remap.start,
> (ULL)op->remap.range);
> } else {
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
> }
> }
> if (!skip)
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
Maybe update the code here (REMAP case) to call
xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops once. I feel like that would be a bit
cleaner and use the new interface correctly.
Matt
> break;
> }
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_UNMAP:
> @@ -2581,7 +2581,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> return -EBUSY;
>
> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
> break;
> case DRM_GPUVA_OP_PREFETCH:
> vma = gpuva_to_vma(op->base.prefetch.va);
> @@ -2593,7 +2593,7 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_ops_parse(struct xe_vm *vm, struct drm_gpuva_ops *ops,
> }
>
> if (!xe_vma_is_cpu_addr_mirror(vma))
> - xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask);
> + xe_vma_ops_incr_pt_update_ops(vops, op->tile_mask, 1);
> break;
> default:
> drm_warn(&vm->xe->drm, "NOT POSSIBLE");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list