Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/xe/xe2hpg: Add Wa_16025250150 (rev2)
Aradhya Bhatia
aradhya.bhatia at intel.com
Fri Mar 28 06:36:12 UTC 2025
Hi,
On 28-03-2025 04:59, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/xe/xe2hpg: Add Wa_16025250150 (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/146709/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def_FULL -> xe-pw-146709v2_FULL
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-146709v2_FULL absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-146709v2_FULL, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-146709v2_FULL:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt at kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-linear-to-16bpp-linear-upscaling:
> - shard-lnl: [PASS][1] -> ([PASS][2], [INCOMPLETE][3]) +1 other test ( 1 incomplete, 1 pass )
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def/shard-lnl-2/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-linear-to-16bpp-linear-upscaling.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-linear-to-16bpp-linear-upscaling.html
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-lnl-1/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-linear-to-16bpp-linear-upscaling.html
>
> * igt at kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf:
> - shard-lnl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4]
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-lnl-8/igt@kms_plane_multiple@2x-tiling-yf.html
>
> * igt at kms_vblank@query-busy-hang:
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][5] -> ([INCOMPLETE][6], [PASS][7]) +2 other tests ( 1 incomplete, 1 pass )
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def/shard-dg2-464/igt@kms_vblank@query-busy-hang.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-dg2-432/igt@kms_vblank@query-busy-hang.html
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-dg2-463/igt@kms_vblank@query-busy-hang.html
>
> * igt at kms_vblank@query-busy-hang at pipe-d-dp-2:
> - shard-dg2-set2: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][8]
> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-dg2-432/igt@kms_vblank@query-busy-hang@pipe-d-dp-2.html
>
> * igt at xe_exec_sip_eudebug@wait-writesip-nodebug at drm_xe_engine_class_compute0:
> - shard-lnl: [PASS][9] -> [INCOMPLETE][10] +1 other test incomplete
> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def/shard-lnl-4/igt@xe_exec_sip_eudebug@wait-writesip-nodebug@drm_xe_engine_class_compute0.html
> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-lnl-7/igt@xe_exec_sip_eudebug@wait-writesip-nodebug@drm_xe_engine_class_compute0.html
>
> * igt at xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue:
> - shard-bmg: [PASS][11] -> ([PASS][12], [ABORT][13])
> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def/shard-bmg-4/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
> [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-bmg-3/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
> [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-bmg-4/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][14] -> ([ABORT][15], [PASS][16])
> [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2859-1e750490a76bbb8bcb8ea8d5fba2a68bf0845def/shard-dg2-435/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
> [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-dg2-435/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
> [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-146709v2/shard-dg2-436/igt@xe_fault_injection@exec-queue-create-fail-xe_hw_engine_group_add_exec_queue.html
>
These possible regressions do not seem to be related to my patch.
--
Regards
Aradhya
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list