[LDTP-Dev] [Bug 547541] New: gettextvalue in ooldtp is passing one extra argument

[LDTP (bugzilla.gnome.org)]

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547541

  LDTP | pyldtp | Ver: 1.2.0
           Summary: gettextvalue in ooldtp is passing one extra argument
           Product: LDTP
           Version: 1.2.0
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: pyldtp
        AssignedTo: ldtp-maint at gnome.bugs
        ReportedBy: apulido at gmail.com
         QAContact: ldtp-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Please describe the problem:
In ooldtp.py gettextvalue is passing one more argument to ldtp.gettextvalue.

If you have a text component and want to get the text value, you would do:

textcomponent = mywindow.getchild('txt0')
mytext = textcomponent.gettextvalue()

That would raise an exception: Min 1 argument required

That is not true, as the minimum arguments for ldtp.gettextvalue are only the
context and the component name, which we already have.

Moreover, if you try to pass a fake argument to it, it raise another exception:

 File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/ooldtp.py", line 342, in gettextvalue
    return ldtp.gettextvalue (self.__window, name, textProperty, startPosition,
endPosition)
TypeError: gettextvalue() takes at most 4 arguments (5 given)





Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information:


-- 
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.

You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547541.