[Libburn] Libburn 0.2

[Archit Baweja]

Hey

I would agree having the well-known "Release early and often" cycle, but 
not really specifying an exact period. Just release after a few bug fixes etc.

Archit

P.S. You can see that I don't appreciate the Gnome Release Cycle for personal 
reasons :-D

Also, there is no harm in doing a no feature/bug-fix release. Spice it up :D

Todd Kulesza <todd@dropline.net> writes:

> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 15:59, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > Sorry about that, I didn't realize you were so close to done.
> > 
> 
> Well, "done" and "usable" are two different things... the code is mostly
> in place, but there's a lot of cleaning-up I'd like to do.
> 
> > I'm hoping to shorten the delay between releases, 0.3 shouldn't be too far
> > off anyway.  It might just add TAO (which is already mostly in place),
> > and clean up a few little corner cases I've been ignoring.
> 
> Maybe we could do time-based development releases; release every (2
> weeks?  monthly?) just to keep up interest and allow enough time for
> feedback to trickle in between releases.  The lib is in heavy
> development, so releases don't need to be 100% perfect.  I'd say getting
> more eyeballs looking at the code and banging on the latest version is
> the main goal this early in a product's lifecycle :)
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libburn mailing list
> Libburn@pdx.freedesktop.org
> http://pdx.freedesktop.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libburn