[Libburn] Looking at the libburn code
Philip Martin
philip at codematters.co.uk
Tue Feb 14 16:19:41 PST 2006
I've just had a look at some of the libburn code for the first time
and there are a few issues that I see:
- The pthread_mutex_xxx functions all have return values but these are
ignored by the libburn code. These functions are unlikely to fail,
but assuming they won't fail is a bit of a gamble.
- Calls to write(2) and close(2) don't have their return value
checked, these calls could fail.
- The pthread_create return value is checked but the libburn code
doesn't do anything sensible -- the calling function returns no
error but the linked list refers to free'd memory. Again, it's
unlikely to happen, but it's not impossible.
- A pthread_mutex_t is copied when enumerate_common calls
burn_drive_register in sg.c. POSIX classifies that as undefined
behaviour, although it works on lots of systems.
- There is no call to pthread_mutex_destroy, that could be a problem
on some platforms.
- There is a realloc call in structure.c that doesn't make use the
return value. I assume it's reducing the memory allocation and so
the memory is unlikely to be moved, but it's still not portable.
- Some of the files have unnecessary includes, e.g. sbc.c, others
don't have includes for things they use, e.g. transport.h doesn't
include pthread.h and relies on sys/types.h pulling in something
suitable.
- Is burn_wait_all supposed to sleep? The current implementation
would appear to skip the sleep.
I regard all of the above as bugs, although some of them will rarely
if ever affect Linux. Is the project interested in fixing them?
--
Philip Martin
More information about the libburn
mailing list