[Libdlo] [PATCH] Fix displaylink-mod with 2.6.32

Jonathan McDowell noodles at earth.li
Thu Dec 9 16:21:50 PST 2010


On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:57:59PM -0800, Bernie Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan McDowell <noodles at earth.li> wrote:
> > 1680x1050 is 1764000 pixels, so should fit in the 2080000 limit?
> 
> Yes, this is a bug.  I'll look into how it could happen (and why it
> hasn't been something run across before).
> 
> Udlfb is not rejecting the 1680x1050 mode, it's noted as valid .. yet
> it's not getting chosen by the fbdev function fb_find_best_display()
> that we call.  Can you "uname -a" to tell us what kernel version
> you're on?

It's the stock kernel from Debian/Squeeze; 2.6.32:

Linux thukpa 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 25 18:02:11 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I can potentially try a 2.6.37 RC kernel, but that might take a bit as
this is my work box and now I have a working solution it's harder to
justify downtime fiddling with it.

J.

-- 
Web [   It's ten o'clock; do you know where your processes are?    ]
site: http:// [                                          ]       Made by
www.earth.li/~noodles/  [                      ]         HuggieTag 0.0.24


More information about the Libdlo mailing list