[Libdlo] Howto install displaylink drive with ubunut
Face Man
solo9300 at hotmail.com
Wed May 26 14:43:44 PDT 2010
Tim, for some reason i could not Figure out howto post a readable email :) therefore, here is a link <a href="http://blogs.aldimna.com/?65a55cf2-3426-4447-b680-d51de33f8064">http://blogs.aldimna.com/?65a55cf2-3426-4447-b680-d51de33f8064</a>Sincerely, Face
> From: libdlo-request at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Libdlo Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12
> To: libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:00:08 -0700
>
> Send Libdlo mailing list submissions to
> libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libdlo
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> libdlo-request at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> libdlo-owner at lists.freedesktop.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Libdlo digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Howto install displaylink drive with ubunut 10.04 (Tim Green)
> 2. Re: defio mmap issues (Bernie Thompson)
> 3. Re: defio mmap issues (Justin Hammond)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:18:38 +0100
> From: Tim Green <timothy.j.green at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Libdlo] Howto install displaylink drive with ubunut
> 10.04
> To: libdlo <libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTinDkYSGlKBH05U0AxugWxCxfJWBdBI2-ptQvAIj at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Thanks for the tips, but could you post again with new line characters?
>
> Regards,
> Tim.
>
> On 25 May 2010 19:24, Face Man <solo9300 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> well,?? ?i ?really had problem getting my USB Display Adapter (Kensington Universal Multi-Display Adapter )?? to work and i hope this could help others.?? ??? ?Installation Guide?? ??? ?1- update your linux kernel to linux kernel 2.6.34?? ? ? ?open Terminal:?? ? ? ? ? ?cd ~/Desktop?? ? ? ? ? ?mkdir kernel-2.6.34?? ? ? ? ? ?cd kernel-2.6.34
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:50:52 -0700
> From: Bernie Thompson <bernie at plugable.com>
> Subject: Re: [Libdlo] defio mmap issues
> To: justin at dynam.ac, libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTimPijck7SJWxm4DsHdohAswl2tBgXxN_QJIp5rd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Just an update on this problem (detail below) of horizontal artifacts
> with defio enabled in udlfb, and then using a standard (non-damage
> aware) mmap client like the generic fbdev X server ....
>
> Others ran across these same problems in a different (non-DisplayLink)
> context, and are working on a fix. I've not tested these patches to
> defio yet, but they may resolve this issue
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=127369791432181
>
> Note: There's some further discussion on the list, so this is likely
> not the final patch they'll run with. But it's great that there
> appears to be a fix on the horizon for this.
>
> Best wishes,
> Bernie
> http://plugable.com/
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bernie Thompson <bernie at plugable.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 AM, <justin at dynam.ac> wrote:
>>>
>>> On a side note, and maybe for a latter email, I'm also getting horizontal
>>> artifacts on the screen after several hours of operations. Reading the
>>> archives, I saw someone else post on this, and there was a thought there
>>> was a race condition on the memmap. This is very reproducible for me
>>> (takes about 1 hour though) so if I can provide further info to help debug
>>> that, I'm willing to take on the challenge!
>>
>>
>> Here are some datapoints from trying to track down this issue:
>>
>> * The problem happens both with the latest udlfb from git.plugable.com, and
>> with jaya's original defio driver patch posted a few months back. So it
>> could be a problem carried forward, but it doesn't look like a new problem
>> ..
>> * It can be seen more frequently with faster processors and larger screens.
>> On my atom with 1920x1080, it's intermittent and small corruption.? On a
>> faster Celeron with 3 1680x1050 screens, it starts happening quickly with
>> any significant screen activity.
>> * And a fun one: on that multi-screen setup, once you get large areas of the
>> one screen (one DL device) to fail to render ... then moving the mouse and
>> triggering rendering on the *other* DL device/screen, for the corresponding
>> lines on the screen, refreshes the first device/screen properly (!)? Since
>> udlfb keeps no shared state between different DisplayLink devices,
>> apparently this confusion is happening at the defio/vma/page table level.
>>
>> Defio is used by several other framebuffer drivers, but perhaps not at these
>> resolutions and not for multiple screens.? Has anyone seen other evidence
>> that would support/contradict this being a general defio problem?? Or
>> perhaps something simple/stupid that udlfb is doing to trigger it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bernie
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:20:18 +0800
> From: Justin Hammond <justin at dynam.ac>
> Subject: Re: [Libdlo] defio mmap issues
> To: Bernie Thompson <bernie at plugable.com>
> Cc: "libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org" <libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Message-ID: <79C72CC3-66DB-4E03-81EB-DCDCE4A595E7 at dynam.ac>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi Bernie,
> Thanks for the heads up. I'll do some testing and see how it goes.
>
> Justin
>
> On 26-May-2010, at 3:50 AM, Bernie Thompson <bernie at plugable.com> wrote:
>
>> Just an update on this problem (detail below) of horizontal artifacts
>> with defio enabled in udlfb, and then using a standard (non-damage
>> aware) mmap client like the generic fbdev X server ....
>>
>> Others ran across these same problems in a different (non-DisplayLink)
>> context, and are working on a fix. I've not tested these patches to
>> defio yet, but they may resolve this issue
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=127369791432181
>>
>> Note: There's some further discussion on the list, so this is likely
>> not the final patch they'll run with. But it's great that there
>> appears to be a fix on the horizon for this.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Bernie
>> http://plugable.com/
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bernie Thompson
>> <bernie at plugable.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:57 AM, <justin at dynam.ac> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On a side note, and maybe for a latter email, I'm also getting
>>>> horizontal
>>>> artifacts on the screen after several hours of operations. Reading
>>>> the
>>>> archives, I saw someone else post on this, and there was a thought
>>>> there
>>>> was a race condition on the memmap. This is very reproducible for me
>>>> (takes about 1 hour though) so if I can provide further info to
>>>> help debug
>>>> that, I'm willing to take on the challenge!
>>>
>>>
>>> Here are some datapoints from trying to track down this issue:
>>>
>>> * The problem happens both with the latest udlfb from git.plugable.com
>>> , and
>>> with jaya's original defio driver patch posted a few months back.
>>> So it
>>> could be a problem carried forward, but it doesn't look like a new
>>> problem
>>> ..
>>> * It can be seen more frequently with faster processors and larger
>>> screens.
>>> On my atom with 1920x1080, it's intermittent and small corruption.
>>> On a
>>> faster Celeron with 3 1680x1050 screens, it starts happening
>>> quickly with
>>> any significant screen activity.
>>> * And a fun one: on that multi-screen setup, once you get large
>>> areas of the
>>> one screen (one DL device) to fail to render ... then moving the
>>> mouse and
>>> triggering rendering on the *other* DL device/screen, for the
>>> corresponding
>>> lines on the screen, refreshes the first device/screen properly
>>> (!) Since
>>> udlfb keeps no shared state between different DisplayLink devices,
>>> apparently this confusion is happening at the defio/vma/page table
>>> level.
>>>
>>> Defio is used by several other framebuffer drivers, but perhaps not
>>> at these
>>> resolutions and not for multiple screens. Has anyone seen other
>>> evidence
>>> that would support/contradict this being a general defio problem? Or
>>> perhaps something simple/stupid that udlfb is doing to trigger it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bernie
>>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libdlo mailing list
> Libdlo at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libdlo
>
>
> End of Libdlo Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12
> **************************************
More information about the Libdlo
mailing list