Establishing connections to multiple PDPs simultaneously with MBIM
ngompa13 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 08:13:04 PDT 2015
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 08:57 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Markus Gothe <nietzsche at lysator.liu.se>
> > > Please tell me if I am wrong… But this quite a design issue which we
> need to come down to consensus… Right?
> > Well, it's not like we're changing the behavior of the kernel driver.
> > This is just a small design issue in mbimcli :)
> > What's your opinion on this? Do you prefer the "=" separated key/value
> > pairs, or just the prefixed "N:" with additional optional arguments
> > for things like ip-type?
> I personally prefer = separated key/value pairs, keeping compat with the
> old unkeyed format. So I'll try to do that, but might not happen this
If I could chime in for a moment:
I favor the key/value pair format, as it makes it easier to figure out how
to lay out configuration information. Heck, it makes it possible for me to
easily structure a program that would take in JSON data representing the
configuration and map it straight to mbimcli so that it can be processed.
It would be also awesome if some kind of key/value output format could be
available as an option for parsing the output that comes back after mbimcli
successfully connects. The human-readable output today that shows up in git
master is great for humans, but it's a bit tricky to parse for scripting.
If there's a key/value input and key/value output mechanism, that would
make what I'm working on much easier.
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the libmbim-devel