Versioning

Aleksander Morgado aleksander at lanedo.com
Tue Nov 6 10:21:01 PST 2012


On 06/11/12 18:10, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>>> It seems like libqmi is getting stable enough to use now, and I then
>>>>> > >>> wonder if you have considered making a release?
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> This would make it easier to have something to base testing of packaging
>>>>> > >>> for distributions on.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> An alpha/<1.0 version would be enough.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >> I don't really have any objection, truth be told. That would make easier
>>>> > >> to package the new ModemManager whenever it's released.
>>> > > 
>>> > > Yes, you probably need to say in the release notes of ModemManager 0.7
>>> > > that it requires libqmi >= x.y.z (I assume that it can be newer or does
>>> > > it break backwards compatibility?).
>>> > > 
>> > 
>> > We will definitely avoid breaking the libqmi-glib API, so in
>> > ModemManager we'll treat it as any other external library. As soon as we
>> > get the first release out, MM will very likely just use >= x.y.z when
>> > looking for it. Note anyway that MM can be compiled using --without-qmi,
>> > so it won't be a hard build dependency.
> I too think we're at the point where we should make a release.  And
> breaking with open-source tradition, how about 1.0? :)

Sounds good!

-- 
Aleksander


More information about the libqmi-devel mailing list