-32763.0 dBm

[Aleksander Morgado]

>>>>>>> Your output with Get Signal Strength was before:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ECIO:
>>>>>>>         Network 'umts': '-126.0 dBm'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That was given from a raw read value of '252' treated as unsigned. If we
>>>>>>> treat that value as signed we would get '-4', which multiplied by (-0.5)
>>>>>>> gives us +2dBm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which takes us to the next issue, which is that EcIo is not supposed to
>>>>>> be positive as you usually have more interference/noise than signal
>>>>>> energy...
>>>>>
>>>>> Really? Well, anyway, the last patch seems to give consistent readings:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I pushed the fix now; if someone wants to investigate a bit more
>>>> regarding the reported Ec/Io values it would be great.
>>>
>>> EC/IO given in dBm should actually be always negative; values of less
>>> less than 3 (ie, -2 or -1 which would be really, really good signal)
>>> typically aren't seen since they're so good, just like you never get a
>>> WiFi signal better than -20 dBm.
>>>
>>> Quick overview:
>>>
>>> http://www.telecomhall.com/what-is-ecio-and-ebno.aspx
>>>
>>
>> Can anyone else check the reported Ec/Io values with other modems? I'm
>> still stuck with modems with pretty old NAS, which they don't report
>> Ec/Io at all... :/
> 
> Does UML290 work here?
> 

Still in CDMA mode my UML290, no luck putting it in UMTS mode yet :-/

-- 
Aleksander