[PATCH v2 5/5] loc: add definitions for more messages

[Bjørn Mork]

Aleksander Morgado <aleksander at aleksander.es> writes:

>> I was not aware of the rule that TLV < 0x10 should be mandatory.
>> Maybe we could express the default logic in the code generator?
>>
>
> Not that I've seen that rule in written anywhere... I just got that
> impression from all the other messages I've encoded myself :)
>
> Maybe we could have a warning issued by the generator if it finds some
> inconsitencies with that rule, but I wouldn't hardcode the logic to be
> applied automatically... unless we see it in written somewhere! :)

It sure would be nice if Qualcomm published some of their now ancient
docs under a less restrictive agreement...  Then we could have answered
both this question and the little endian question.

But I guess we just have to pretend we don't know the answers :-)

Maybe Qualcomm will apply for a patent on little endian?  Or maybe Apple
already did?  Who knows.  I am sure it is important that we don't
disclose this company critical information.


Bjørn