[LGM] [CREATE] ORA Bof at LGM 2018

Jehan jehan at girinstud.io
Sat Apr 28 16:26:00 UTC 2018


Hi!

On 2018-04-28 18:05, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> That is great!
> 
> I am really sorry I can't be there (LGM and BoF)  - but if only the
> points from 2016 can
> be pushed forward, that is already great.
> Having a  this proper site for the format itself is awesome.
> 
> With the introdution of the new pixel formats in GIMP's XCF, I
> perceive even more the need
> to definitely evolve .ORA. - among other things, having other image
> formats than "png" for layers,
> sice those are constrained by 16bpp images.

Yeah I thought about this too. But let's not discuss about various 
technical details on this mailing list (otherwise I could have discussed 
for hours at yesterday's meeting). We'll deal with bugs and evolutions 
of the format one at a time in dedicated tickets.

> (On the other hand accepting "TIFF" as layers would defeat the
> existence of ORA itself) -

Not necessarily. The problem with TIFF is to be over-complicated. ORA 
should not be, it will be simpler and well specified. We could still use 
TIFF just for individual layers in a simple way (only for high bit 
depth, not using advanced features).

Anyway not saying that we should use TIFF. Maybe other formats are 
better suited. Just saying that the fact that a format itself has a lot 
of features should not prevent us to use it for simpler needs.

But as I said, this is not the time to speak about these details. Sorry, 
I let myself answer unexpectedly. :P

Jehan

> so I hope you can talk about that and come out with a solution (even if 
> its
>  a raw float numbers file encoded in separate planes, with the metadata
> needed to reasemble it in xml form, in another file (starting with
> width and height) )
> 
> On 28 April 2018 at 05:01, Boudewijn Rempt <boud at valdyas.org> wrote:
>> We have registered openraster.org now and will be setting up the 
>> website in
>> the next week.
>> 
>> On vrijdag 27 april 2018 20:15:19 CEST Wolthera wrote:
>>> I am very happy to hear that at the very least there's consensus 
>>> about
>>> moving forward. :)
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud at valdyas.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> > We haven't done much, but will try to get Andrew to act again; plus we
>>> > added a
>>> > few notes to https://pad.constantvzw.org/p/lgm2016.openraster.bof
>>> > --
>>> > Boudewijn Rempt | https://www.krita.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > CREATE mailing list
>>> > CREATE at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Boudewijn Rempt | https://www.krita.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list
>> Libre-graphics-meeting at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting
> _______________________________________________
> Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list
> Libre-graphics-meeting at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-graphics-meeting

-- 
ZeMarmot open animation film
http://film.zemarmot.net
Liberapay: https://liberapay.com/ZeMarmot/
Patreon: https://patreon.com/zemarmot
Tipeee: https://www.tipeee.com/zemarmot


More information about the Libre-graphics-meeting mailing list