[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112020] Insert Special Character arbitrarily restricts which characters in font can be inserted

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Fri Aug 25 12:22:08 UTC 2017


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112020

--- Comment #6 from Kenneth Hanson <khanson679 at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> Font substitution is another question. We made a suggestion how to improve
> this situation at
> https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2016/10/21/dealing-with-missing-
> fonts/

Yes, this wasn't the best example. Glad to see that work is being done on this
one, though!

> Talking about the special character dialog there is room for advanced
> features, no question. While the average user searches by the unicode name
> <foo>, your use case is to look for a particular unicode id <U+XYZ> not
> knowing in what font it is defined.

I think you've written part of this backwards. Searching by name is indeed
easier. But KCharSelect can search by name, while LO can't yet.

I think both methods are critical with or without a filter by font. By name is
for finding a character, by code point is when you already know what you want
and want it as quickly as possible.

You're right, though, that I want to be able to search by character first, font
second. Fonts are too erratic in what symbols they contain, and you don't
necessarily know in advance which ones have what you're looking for.

> Once we have collected all these
> advanced functions we can think about a second view, perhaps a tab or an
> expandable area, where those could be added. But for now I believe our
> solution is superior to KCharSelect for most users.

Right now or in the upcoming 6.0?

KCharSelect is indeed unhelpful, since I now understand that it does font
substitution without telling you -- that's what caused me to make this
erroneous bug report in the first place.

But LO is definitely *not* superior yet, because of the missing functionality
to search by name. Once it has this much, it will be adequate for the purpose
of occasionally inserting symbols.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170825/fdc0df7c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list