[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108944] FILEOPEN: DOCX: footnote separators missing

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Tue Jul 4 11:29:13 UTC 2017


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108944

Xisco FaulĂ­ <xiscofauli at libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |bibisected, bisected,
                   |                            |filter:docx, regression
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |vmiklos at collabora.co.uk,
                   |                            |xiscofauli at libreoffice.org
            Version|6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Master      |5.4.0.0.alpha1+
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Xisco FaulĂ­ <xiscofauli at libreoffice.org> ---
Regression introduced by:

author  Miklos Vajna <vmiklos at collabora.co.uk>  2017-05-03 06:39:31 (GMT)
committer       Miklos Vajna <vmiklos at collabora.co.uk>  2017-05-03 15:02:19
(GMT)
commit  e79ef12b7a904f17d4147fa409d055c12b70f952 (patch)
tree    183a50f46068c82349441b3ba3ee72847f20f8a6
parent  cc0ea8bb251c464d55e831ed7e11a2f3f7371d38 (diff)
tdf#107033 DOCX import: fix unexpected missing footnote separator
Regression from commit 330b860205c7ba69dd6603f65324d0f89ad9cd5f
(fdo#68787 DOCX import: handle when w:separator is missing for
footnotes, 2013-09-04), the problem was footnote settings were modified
also in case there were no footnotes at all in the document.

Make the bug scenario and the original one working at the same time by
touching footnote settings only in case there is at least one footnote
in the current section.

Bisected with bibisect-linux-64-5.4

Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170704/f2a6d65c/attachment.html>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list