[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108956] EDITING: LibO unresponsive after HTML paste

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108956

Xisco Faulí <xiscofauli at libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|bibisectRequest             |bibisected, bisected
                 CC|                            |vmiklos at collabora.co.uk
                 OS|Windows (All)               |All

--- Comment #2 from Xisco Faulí <xiscofauli at libreoffice.org> ---
Regression introduced by:

author  Miklos Vajna <vmiklos at collabora.co.uk>  2017-06-16 06:35:05 (GMT)
committer       Miklos Vajna <vmiklos at collabora.co.uk>  2017-06-16 10:58:38
(GMT)
commit  6ade80cf142664e78954c7544534e9436ceb90c7 (patch)
tree    1067e9c880fc6a68eed2a18368bfe94a892522e4
parent  559b641b3ff3500547bf7c79741e1e5b4414d404 (diff)
tdf#108524 sw: allow move of frame inside section without columns
The intention here is to deny the move of a frame that's inside a table
inside a section.  But the code also checked if there a column frame
in-between, so it allowed the move for a frame in a section with 2 cols,
but not without columns (which does not sound intentional, since that's
a simpler case). So drop the requirement to have a column frame between
the argument and the section frame, just check that there is no table
frame in between.

This is needed, but not enough to split the section in the bugdoc (but
at least now the content of the section is marked as movable).

Bisected with bibisect-linux64-6.0

Adding Cc: to Miklos Vajna

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170705/5501f7ca/attachment-0001.html>