[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108145] Notebookbar background color should be defaulting to toolbar color

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145

--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
(In reply to Volga from comment #0)
> Description:
> The default foreground color used on the Notebookbar looks lighter than the
> color used in toolbar, but the default background color looks darker than
> toolbar.

On Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with
Version: 5.5.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 6517fd2107a5a71290afad8850da0eab51519bc6
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86_64 at 42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-06-01_23:17:13
Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: CL

The "foreground" color for an active tab _is_ lighter than the inactive tabs.
While the inactive tabs have the same gray as used for the the toolbars. But I
think both of those are implemented correctly.

As an aside, checking with a theme applied (Tools -> Options ->
Personalization) would expect the "foreground" of the active tab would pick up
a color when applying a theme--as is the tabbed Notebookbar does not style well
when applying a theme.

Regards the separation of the menu bar (when active) from the Notebookbar,
agree with Volga that the frame border is not needed and is visually jarring.
We don't have a widget border separating the Standard toolbar from the Menu bar
in default modes--so I think the decoration is not needed above the notebook
bar modes when the menu bar is enabled.

Unfortunately, the "Groupedbar Full" and "Groupedbar Compact" modes will not
toggle the menu bar active (bug 107158) so can not check border appearance and
offset of the Menu bar in those modes. But if present it should be removed
there as well. Think that would be an issue on its own.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170602/23cc80a3/attachment.html>