[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103656] Read-only bar is unreadable when using dark theme

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103656

Buovjaga <todventtu at suomi24.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Severity|normal                      |minor

--- Comment #8 from Buovjaga <todventtu at suomi24.fi> ---
I launched a VM with GNOME and changed the theme to a dark one and I confirm
the problem.

Version: 5.3.4.2
Build ID: 5.3.4-1
CPU Threads: 1; OS Version: Linux 4.11; UI Render: default; VCL: gtk3; Layout
Engine: new; 
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group

(In reply to Rimas Kudelis from comment #6)
> I'm making it sound like you're supposed to care a bit more than a casual
> user like me, since *you* are a member of the QA team, not me.

Quit trying to build walls. I can't believe you are writing such absurd
statements.

(In reply to Rimas Kudelis from comment #6)
> I know quite well what open source is, but this mentality within LibreOffice
> QA team of some idealistic QA process being above everything else has
> annoyed me more than once already.

There is nothing idealistic about it. It is very realistic. The point is that
scarce developer resources need to be focused on investigating known bugs. Even
with this system of independent confirmation, developers are regularly having
to close reports due to some misunderstanding or whatever and thus wasting
their time.

(In reply to Rimas Kudelis from comment #6)
> I mean, if I wouldn't burst out like this, you (the LibreOffice QA and
> developers) would probably just ignore this bug until 4.4 is released, then
> ask me to confirm that the issue is still there, then ignore it again, then
> ask me to confirm that it's still there in 5.0, and so on and so forth. What
> is that supposed to tell me?

On the contrary, you are not helping yourself, but making it harder as no one
wants to help a person with such a disgusting attitude. People reading your
comments will whip out their shitlists and write "note: never help this Rimas
guy".

(In reply to Rimas Kudelis from comment #6)
> If you don't think a particular bug deserves attention (low traffic, etc.),
> that's fine. But what's the point of asking submitters to re-test their bugs
> with each new release, if these bugs hadn't even been worked on?

You are twisting things around and assuming motives. Apparently it did not
occur to you that only a minority of testers at any given point in time will be
running GNOME desktops.

The point of asking for a re-test is that we are seeing 20-30% WORKSFORME
closing rates for mass re-test requests for bugs older than 1 year. We don't do
it to annoy reporters, but because there is a real chance something is working
in a newer release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170625/92496ef6/attachment.html>