[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 82173] FILEOPEN: DOCX - "Footnote References" character styles incorrectly imported
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Sun May 21 00:40:27 UTC 2017
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85 at hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|FILEOPEN: DOCX footnote |FILEOPEN: DOCX - "Footnote
|numbers are large |References" character
| |styles incorrectly imported
--- Comment #11 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85 at hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Justin L from comment #10)
> MSO's "footnote reference" character style doesn't get imported into the
> twin "Footnote Characters / Footnote Anchor" styles in Writer for DOCX. (It
> works fine for DOC.)
Seems LO is importing the style correctly but not mapping it within the correct
style names. LO is importing MS's "Footnote Reference" into "Default Paragraph
Font > footnote reference" rather than into "Footnote Anchor" and "Footnote
Characters". Below is the relevant xml code in attachment 133420.
== /word/styles.xml ==
<w:style w:type="character" w:default="1" w:styleId="DefaultParagraphFont">
<w:name w:val="Default Paragraph Font" />
<w:uiPriority w:val="99" />
<w:semiHidden />
</w:style>
<...>
<w:style w:type="character" w:styleId="FootnoteReference">
<w:name w:val="footnote reference" />
<w:basedOn w:val="DefaultParagraphFont" />
<w:uiPriority w:val="99" />
<w:semiHidden />
<w:rsid w:val="00132573" />
<w:rPr>
<w:rFonts w:cs="Times New Roman" />
<w:i />
<w:color w:val="00FF00" />
<w:kern w:val="2" />
<w:vertAlign w:val="superscript" />
</w:rPr>
</w:style>
== /word/footnotes.xml ==
<...>
<w:r>
<w:rPr>
<w:rStyle w:val="FootnoteReference" />
</w:rPr>
<w:footnoteRef />
</w:r>
<...>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20170521/72b99b3a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Libreoffice-bugs
mailing list