[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 115325] Regression: Calc v6 opens .ODS file slower than v5

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115325

--- Comment #4 from Dan Dascalescu <ddascalescu+freedesktop at gmail.com> ---
I installed 6.0.0.2 and 6.0.0.3 from
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/GetInvolved#Test_Pre-releases
(http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/deb/x86_64/LibreOffice_6.0.0.3_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz,
more specifically)
and 5.4.4.2 from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/ (more
specifically,
http://mirror.sjc02.svwh.net/tdf/libreoffice/stable/5.4.4/deb/x86_64/LibreOffice_5.4.4_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz)

Then I installed 6.0.0.3 from
https://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/tdf/libreoffice/stable/6.0.0/deb/x86_64/LibreOffice_6.0.0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz
and it's just as slow as the dev build.

I haven't ever installed LO from an Ubuntu repo or PPA. I've always downloaded
the x86_64 .debs from libreoffice.org/download and ran `sudo dpkg -i *.deb`.

As a friendly note, testers with a thinner skin might be rubbed the wrong way
by abrupt statements like "the comparison is senseless", when they've taken the
time to submit screencasts showing a clear difference in speed. Also, they
might not know what "TDF DEB" is (I imagine those are .deb files provided by
The Document foundation?).

I have a thicker skin, fortunately, so I'll ask instead where exactly I should
download v6 from, and how come my v5 is still faster, even though it comes from
a URL that contains both "tdf" and "deb" in it. Does that mean that if I
installed LO from some Ubuntu PPA, it would be even faster? Why isn't there
anything about this difference in speed mentioned on the
libreoffice.org/download page?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20180131/eb462fce/attachment.html>