[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114719] New RYB based standard palette: cleanup assigned RGB values and color names (result comment 44)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114719

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #53 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
(In reply to Flora Canou from comment #52)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #51)
> > ...
> 
> The flaw consists in the algorithm. If we must keep an RYB-based palette, it
> is favorable to find one that does not go wrong in dark colors. 
>

OK will close as there is no better RYB palette generator. But as indicated
still may move the 4th shade from 80% to ~70%, but Shades are always going to
drift from the hue--even mixing paint in real world...

=> RF

> 
> This palette also looks generally too warm in my eyes. Maybe I'll try
> developing an RGB-based standard palette as an extension

Looking forward to it, but would suggest you not name extension as standard
palette (standard.soc); rather if you compose a RGB (HSV based) you like,
loading the extension can swap it in for the standard.soc palette if that is
your goal. 

Just watch out for Light Blue 2 and Dark Blue 1 as those values are hard coded
in the unit tests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20180712/448690aa/attachment.html>