[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63642] Math formula looses custom font settings on save as Flat XML

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63642

--- Comment #18 from Regina Henschel <rb.henschel at t-online.de> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #17)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #16)
> > Looked once again: C would not help.
> 
> Sorry: I don't see why? C is the way Spreadsheet embedding into text
> document works; there are <office:meta>; <office:settings>;
> <office:scripts>; ... etc, and finally, <office:body> with the spreadsheet
> itself, all inside <office:document>. Why can't it be reused for Math - and
> be better for consistency?

In case of a spreadsheet you have the nesting <office:document> <office:body>
<office:spreadsheet>. But <office:body> has nothing similar for Math, there
exists not <office:math>. You need a <draw:object> as parent of a <math:math>
element and a <draw:frame> as parent of the <draw:object>. But a <draw:frame>
element needs a parent too, which would be a <office:text>, a <draw:page> or a
<table:shapes> e.g. All together this means, that you embed a document, which
in turn has a math-object embedded. So it is the same problem as now, only one
level down.

If you would really write such structure, you would not be able to distinguish
it from e.g. a Draw-document embedded in a Writer-document where the
Draw-document contains a Math-formula.

I too was allured by then having an additional <office:settings> element.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20180326/5c02bfc9/attachment.html>