[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 121683] Formatting: Some wrong colors in Standard palette

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121683

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vstuart.foote at utsa.edu
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
                   |                            |4719
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
             Blocks|                            |104118
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
No, this is unchanged since the current RYB standard.soc was committed to
project source 2018-01-30

The Standard pallet now uses algorithmic generation [1] of RYB from sRGB
values. Rendering into RYB color theory correct "Tints" (i.e. White added) of
30%, 45%, 60% and 75%; and "Shades" (i.e. Black added) of 20%, 40%, 60% and
80%.

The 20%, 40% and 60% Shades hold their RYB hue fairly well--while the 80% shade
is admittedly a bit muddled, tending into browns.

Design team is committed to a RYB color palette, and not clear a better
algorithm for RYB pallet generation is possible. 

The 80% shade might be reduced to a 70% to render in hue, but the design is
intentional.

A test document ODT [2] table appears as attachment 139004

=-ref-=
[1] https://bahamas10.github.io/ryb/about.html#how
[2] attachment 139005


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104118
[Bug 104118] [META] Color palette bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20181123/379a804d/attachment.html>