[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 32362] Bad behavior of scalable brackets with large objects (comment 18)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32362

--- Comment #46 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #44)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32 of 2016-01-13)
> > It was correct in-between, so it is not the old bug. ...
> 
> What version(s) did it correctly? May the quoted statement have been an
> error?
> 

See comment 30 and bug 97111, after that back to staus quo inherited from OOo--
with some intervening improvements to accuracy of fitting the stretched
bracketing glyphs into their node bounds.

> Will the issue be addressed one day? 

Possibly, and you get notice of it here.

> 
> Despite the fact that there isn't much mention of the 'Math' component in
> forums I would assume that afflicted users (teachers e.g.) might be relevant
> "agents" concerning the standing of free and open software.

And?  Teachers also are welcome to contribute source (as Regina does regularly)
;-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20191210/2508e0fb/attachment.htm>