[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122907] New: FORMATTING Style not correctly applied at conditional formatting
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Wed Jan 23 18:32:33 UTC 2019
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122907
Bug ID: 122907
Summary: FORMATTING Style not correctly applied at conditional
formatting
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 5.1.2.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Calc
Assignee: libreoffice-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: Stefan_Lange_KA at T-Online.de
Created attachment 148570
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=148570&action=edit
Test document to demonstrate the bug
Styles with at least date formatting are not correctly resp. completely applied
at conditional formatting:
- font, alignment and background color are applied
- date format is not applied
To demonstrate the bug I have attached the document
"Test_bedingte_Formatierung_Format_Datum.ods".
In the cells of column A I have entered two date values (01.01.1958 and
02.01.1958) and one text ("kein Datum").
For the cells is defined a conditional formatting with 3 conditions:
1. When day and month both are 1, only the year should be dislayed (style
defined: Datum_jjjj).
2. When day and month not both are 1, the date should be dislayed as dd.mm.yyyy
(style defined: Datum_tt-mm-jjjj).
3. When an error occurs also style Datum_tt-mm-jjjj should be applied.
Expected result (as shown in column C - styles appled without conditional
formatting):
- The date 01.01.1958 should be displayed as 1958.
- The date 02.01.1958 should be displayed as 02.01.1958.
- The text "kein Datum" should be displayed as "kein Datum".
Actual results with LO from 3.3 until 5.1.1.3: as expected -> OK
Actual results with LO from 5.1.2.2 until 6.2.0 rc2, LOdev 6.2.1 and 6.3.0
alphy: the date format from style is ignored and both dates are dsplayed in a
default format, e.g. dd.mm.yy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20190123/9a40e9c4/attachment.html>
More information about the Libreoffice-bugs
mailing list