[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159

Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com> ---
The problem is, the argument of the 4th, 6th, ... parameter depends on the
function selected with the 1st argument. While for AVERAGE(), COUNT(), ... each
argument is an independent cell range reference or array, for the LARGE(),
SMALL(), ... functions every second argument is a number or array (or reference
of course) that determines the operation of the function on the previous
argument and for those functions is mandatory.

However, I agree the wording "Reference 2..n or k3" and so on is slightly
confusing (fwiw, I don't see any "(m-3)" or such there), but I don't have any
better atm. Further problem is, the numbers are generated and there is no
distinction whether it should be "Reference 2, Reference 3, ..." or "Reference
2, k2, Reference 3, k3, ...", the dialog does not know, it has to be a string
that can be applied to all parameters.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20191115/c4b2b290/attachment.html>