[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130677] Support for &h &o Basic literals is incomplete

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130677

LibreOfficiant <LibreOfficiant at sfr.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|6.4.0.3 release             |Inherited From OOo

--- Comment #1 from LibreOfficiant <LibreOfficiant at sfr.fr> ---
MS-VBA help offers little if no information about literals. However foreign
Basic-like languages hold preciser information:

o  IBM LotusScript - Literal number construction rules
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSVRGU_10.0.0/basic/LSAZ_LITERAL_NUMBER_CONSTRUCTION_RULES.html

o  FreeBASIC 
https://www.freebasic.net/wiki/wikka.php?wakka=ProPgLiterals

o  Xojo aka RealBasic 
https://docs.xojo.com/Val & alter

Usage of literals spans over multiple places in Basic. Examples are numerical
expressions and math functions as well as conversion or datatype functions such
as Typename() or Vartype(). It no obvious to locate literal-related QA Basic
test cases or to determine whether they should be spread over various QA test
cases or test suites.

Bugs or enhancement requests with regards to literals are listed herewith.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200215/82883101/attachment.htm>