[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112973] Some font families getting split in English locale

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112973

Mihkel Tõnnov <mihhkel at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |bibisected, bisected
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82
                   |                            |259
                 CC|                            |caolanm at redhat.com

--- Comment #12 from Mihkel Tõnnov <mihhkel at gmail.com> ---
Bibisected first using the sparse Releases repository, which said 4.3.3.1 was
the fist bad "commit". So tried with 44max repository, where:

35dc99d53b0a61823b3731e866dd9da0ab3b9141 is the first bad commit
    commit 9436ae99438ccc24a86aff61aaa9174a9686814f
    Author:     Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com>
    AuthorDate: Fri Sep 12 10:20:48 2014 +0100
    Commit:     Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com>
    CommitDate: Fri Sep 12 10:28:21 2014 +0100

        Related: fdo#82259 implement mac ttf fontname encoding support

        which is why these font's are not appearing under Linux

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9436ae99438ccc24a86aff61aaa9174a9686814f
... which looks like a credible cause indeed (and was backported to 4.3.3 -
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.3.3/RC1).

Adding Caolán to CC.

However I notice that the above results contradict the "Version 3.6.7.2"
information currently in the ticket, so I tested that version specifically
using both the Releases bibisect repo and old appimages - and I don't see this
behaviour there:
3.6.7.2 is fine (no difference between en_US and others).
4.3.0.4 appimage is fine as well, but
4.3.7.2 appimage is broken (different font listing between en_US and others).
This matches with the bibisect result, too.

One thing to note is that I had to run the bibisect using SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen
because otherwise LibO wouldn't start. I don't know if different VCL plugin
could affect this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200108/e4fa9451/attachment.htm>