[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133361] New: Character style applied to a footnote definition is not honored

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Mon May 25 08:15:03 UTC 2020


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133361

            Bug ID: 133361
           Summary: Character style applied to a footnote definition is
                    not honored
           Product: LibreOffice
           Version: 6.4.4.1 rc
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Writer
          Assignee: libreoffice-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: kjambunathan at gmail.com

Created attachment 161249
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161249&action=edit
bug.odt

Character style (in this case 'OrgSuperscript' style) applied to a footnote
definition is NOT honored.  But ... the same character style applied to a
footnote reference is honored correctly.  If you note carefully, the size of
the character style is honored, but not it's position.  In a sense, the
character style is getting applied in only partially.

See attached bug.odt, and the screenshot of  the rendering.  




Version: 6.4.4.2
Build ID: 1:6.4.4-1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; 
Locale: en-IN (en_IN); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded


~$ uname -a
Linux debian 5.6.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.6.7-1 (2020-04-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux

~$ dpkg -l | grep writer
ii  libreoffice-writer                    1:6.4.4-1                           
amd64        office productivity suite -- word processor
ii  libxml-writer-perl                    0.625-1                             
all          Perl module for writing XML documents
~$

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200525/ba65f9f7/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list