[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133291] Graphic style default anchor should be to character

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Mon May 25 16:37:51 UTC 2020


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133291

--- Comment #10 from Telesto <telesto at surfxs.nl> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6)
> > character" and the default style is "Graphics". But "Graphics" contains "to
> > paragraph". Therefore default anchoring and default style no longer match in
> > regard to anchoring for images.
> 
> How do we deal with this situation in respect to bug 99646

WARNING: Typed before Regina answered...

Changing the anchor from to paragraph to to character 'Graphic Style' is no
help for bug 99646. And you can apply Graphic Style to image anchored 'to
character' but doesn't change the anchoring at all (no clue why). However if an
image is anchored to character and the Graphic Style is applied the anchor
changes 'to paragraph

---

@Drifting a little off..
The ultimate/ideal solution is fixing bug 32484. Multiple styles, with
different anchors and wrap settings (and aligning; left/right).. And a way to
define so select a (temporally) default when importing images.. so the same
style is applied over and over.. (but also be able to change that)

And the mouse over info popup should be renamed from 'Frame styles' to "Frame &
Image styles". The caption is not clear. And some more differentiation within
the dialog wouldn't hurt either.. Frame <-> Image <-> OLE are different
objects, IMHO. The technically be the same thing.. but from user perspective
totally different. I'm still not sure where the style label is used for.. [not
saying it has no purpose.. but frame style feel like a bunch of total different
items added together. I actually never considered the formula a frame with a
frame style attached to it.. but that's what you get with a Benjamin.. 

And the caption 'Graphic' for Image style still but dubious to me; I personally
find it confusing name. [I'm willing to report everything in separate bugs
reports, but needs more an integral UX to do list/ minor improvement mock-up ,
instead of me splitting up every detail in 5-10 separate bug reports, and
disuse every point one by one

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200525/0ad4c367/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list