[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136929] Large footer introduced in after filesave DOCX

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Mon Oct 19 14:35:46 UTC 2020


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136929

Telesto <telesto at surfxs.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |UNCONFIRMED

--- Comment #7 from Telesto <telesto at surfxs.nl> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #6)
> I asked Telesto few times, upon seeing they are not well described, not to
> set bibisectRequest in unconfirmed bugs, and again. 

-> I didn't at first, next it requested (back in they day: Xisc0), now I
supposed to refrain.. 

> First, when setting bibisectRequest it should be clear in which version 
> regression came, so to know which repo to choose. Here, not clear. 

-> Comment 2 for the range. 

> When reporting a bug, it's bad practice to just upload large file, there
> should be a minimal size sample. 
> But here, there's no simple bug, nor is it as described "Large footer". It's
> text box in footer.

-> It's text box (or specific text frame + image (called shape24)
And it appears to be figure 21 on page 23 being all over the place

> But I don't see this ever fine, seen if not concentrated to footer but to
> image position. Sometimes it's double, sometimes in the footer.

-> Gibberish to me. Please rephrase. If conclusion is me being wrong and it
also broken in 6.2 please say so.

> I set Needinfo for minimal sample and history of changes, to see if this was
> ever fine and why image is wrong in DOCX.

-> I'm not a trim down specialist; I did trim it down already (from 250 pages)
And the last time I more I stopped working. The size is pretty manageable, even
for a bibisect.

They answer "why" you find out by bibisecting. Which actually still not
'answer' but only a pointer. And it was exported 'fine'; comment 2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20201019/2ba4cc12/attachment.htm>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list