[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Wed Sep 2 12:43:36 UTC 2020
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871
--- Comment #18 from Luke Kendall <luke.kendall at gmail.com> ---
(I wish I could edit my previous comment. Here's what I meant to say.)
(In reply to Telesto from comment #16)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #13)
> they are *not* styles as they designed to be.
>
[...]
> I do see issues to Luke proposal. Same look on screen (font/bold/underline)
> based on two different styles.. So merging DF to a style is not directly
> possible. Which one to pick. Something else is doing a suggestion.. This DF
> formatting matches styles XYZ. Adjust too.
I think the Simplify function even helps with this, because once the DF has
been removed and replaced with a minimum set of auto-created styles, it's then
tractable to go through and find text by style and make a conscious decision to
change the style to an alternative style that has the same look but different
semantics.
So I believe my proposed new functionality:
1) will make styles more understandable to more users
2) makes it practical to clean up a messy unstructured document and turn it
into a clean well-structured one, and
3) solves some (many?) issues around DF.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200902/87984731/attachment.htm>
More information about the Libreoffice-bugs
mailing list