[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136554] Character Style: "Position" properties don't work if overwriting footnote/endnote anchors

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Wed Sep 9 13:00:23 UTC 2020


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136554

R. Green <greenandpleasant2000-support at yahoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |UNCONFIRMED
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0

--- Comment #3 from R. Green <greenandpleasant2000-support at yahoo.co.uk> ---
(In reply to Dieter from comment #1)
> You are searching for a way to insert a footnote in a normal
> position, right?
More general than that. In books, for example, you occasionally see a mixture
of numbers and traditional typographical symbols (e.g. *, †, ‡, §, |, ¶) used
as footnote anchors. (see "New Harts Rules", 2005, section 17.2.3 "Notes and
references: Numbering and Placement").

IME, the character style that works for numbers does not necessarily work well
for non-numericaL symbols: hence the need for two different character styles
for the anchors.

One solution is to use the default character style for numbered footnote
anchors, then create a second character style for typographical mark note
anchors, and apply it over the desired note anchors.

This worked in Open Office but not in LibreOffice. In the latter, for some
reason you cannot overrule the default "Character Style > Position > Position"
properties.

(In reply to Dieter from comment #1)
> I also couldn't find a way. Sounds to me like an enhancement request.
Possibly. But IMV the inconsistent application of the overwriting character
style properties looks like a bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200909/58049488/attachment.htm>


More information about the Libreoffice-bugs mailing list