[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871

--- Comment #35 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tietze at documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #33)
> ... how do you search a whole document filled with 'actual needed' and 
> unneeded DF. Walking a 200 pages text line by line?

That's the use case of "Where is a certain formatting" while the Styles
Inspector addresses the "Why is the text formatted in a certain way", which is
the question here. The "find me all DF" ticket and similar are discussed in the
blog post that lead to the SI where we didnt find a student for the second part
(Styles Highlighter). 

"Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill" this is wrong => NAB
It's also wrong to remove a formatting by unsetting it => WF
Removing individual attributes is requested somewhere else => DUP
Your idea of showing overridden attributes might work but we decided to go with
the SI that also has many more advantages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20200916/cf48ec1a/attachment-0001.htm>