[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org
Thu Mar 18 08:33:20 UTC 2021
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579
--- Comment #45 from sdc.blanco at youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #44)
> Let me describe the internal logic here. Maybe that would help you.
Definitely. I prefer (that word again...) theoretical knowledge over empirical.
iiuc - then this is BOTH a positional and directional phenomenon (where the
positional and directional are strongly correlated, because cursor position is
always somewhere in the active chunk). But I still do not understand "active
chunk" adequately.
> When Writer decides which list to continue, it takes into account the
> selected part that *has the cursor*.
The positional part. And confirmation of the value of "last-selected win"
principle (though I started yesterday to think of it "cursor position")
> Now it knows that to decide what list to continue, it needs to use [para 3
> pos 2 to para 4 pos 10]; but it will not use the blinking cursor position,
> but the *start* of the active chunk, namely, para 3 pos 2
This is the directional part (*start*). But I need a clarification of the
meaning of "active chunk". My guesses about the meaning of "active chunk" have
not been adequate to make an explanation of the difference between Test 2 and
Test 3, where I am guessing it is relevant.
(I confess that it still seems like only cursor position. This is explains why
Test 1 and Test 3 give the same result. And also why Test 5 and Test 2 give the
same result.)
Test 5.
1. Select Para 1
2. Hold Ctrl and select List entry 2.
3. Add to List
Result: Para 1 is added. (just like Test 2).
Probably my simple test document is too simple to be able to see the
significance of *start* of active chunk over "cursor position".
Can you give a concrete example to illustrate that (so I can overcome the
limits of my knowledge from empirical induction)?
In any case, thanks for laying out the internal logic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-bugs/attachments/20210318/85f7058f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Libreoffice-bugs
mailing list