<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Template title and comments shouldnt be used in document"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107513#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Template title and comments shouldnt be used in document"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107513">bug 107513</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:philipz85@hotmail.com" title="Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Yousuf Philips (jay)</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107513#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> Good templates may add content, though I don't see any real use case. Wonder
> how MS handles this option, and IIRC this field is one for the epic fails. </span >
Templates MS provides dont have the fields set.
<span class="quote">> But I tend to agree with Cor (WFM/WF) since the proposed changes introduce
> if/then complexity. Meaning normal documents do store properties but not
> templates? Sounds dangerous.</span >
Normal documents dont store properties unless users set it, so it should be the
same case for documents created through templates.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>